guyanacaribbeanpolitics.com
We reserve the right to edit your comments due to lack of space, political and racial attacks, vulgar and obsene remarks.
All letters must include the Author's name and E-mail address. Send letters to Dr David Hinds
Posted
December 5th. 2007
Re: The Saga of the VAT Tax
Dear Editor,
It is immoral, cynical and opportunist, to say the least, when persons, organisations, or political parties seek to revise or rewrite the history of distant events to suit their own purposes or as part of some sordid design. It goes beyond the pale, however, when this revision or rewriting takes place concerning events that are currently unfolding. History, as it were, is being made! Sadly, the on-going struggles around the imposition of the VAT tax and the public reaction to it is turning out to be the latest victim of this immorality and cynical opportunism.
Christopher Ram And The Debate
The facts are clear. The most recent phase of public struggle over the VAT tax is best symbolised in Christopher Ram's contribution to the now-famous PNC/R debate held at the Tower hotel on Tuesday, 21st November, 2006 on the subject. After that, other political parties joined in, including the WPA which, as we shall see at that stage had held the longest record of public dialogue on the VAT tax in Guyana.
In what followed, notably, Red Thread, the Guyana Human Rights Association (GHRA), the Guyana Trades Union Congress (GTUC), and CN Sharma and his Justice For All Party made the most concerted efforts to press for change. Indeed, CN Sharma and Channel 6 displayed exceptional community mobilisation and persistence in voicing public discontent over the measures. The GHRA mobilised civil society to highlight the human rights and poverty aspects of the Bill. The Red Thread did an enormous amount of grassroots work involving, housewives, mothers and other women. The GTUC was also stout in its opposition to the VAT tax and adopted many of the positions advocated at that stage by the WPA. Regular press releases and letters to the Press indicating the horrendous economic and social costs of the VAT tax were publicized by several individuals and organisations including those mentioned.
The Select Committee Presentations
Immediately preceding the PNC/R debate and Christopher Ram's presentation, however, two significant submissions were made to the Select Committee appointed by the National Assembly to examine and report on the VAT legislation. One was made by Christopher Ram and the other by Distinguished Prof. Clive Thomas and his IDS team. These were circulated widely among organisations, political groups and civil society.
All during this period parties and other organisations made contributions in their own way. Thus the WPA publicized the Guyana Revenue Authority (GRA) figures on the bumper tax yield that exceeded all expectations and called for the Government to lower the tax rates immediately on the standard of living of wage and other fixed income earners.
While broadening the base of opposition to the hardships and excesses of the VAT Tax is welcome, those entering the fray now need to be respectful and honest towards on-going efforts. Jumping on the bandwagon, as it were, seeking some political advantage on this serious issue should be treated for what it is worth with the utmost disdain.
A Plan for the VAT Tax
Once again WPA urges readers to revisit its 1992 Manifesto, where it first called for a National Commission on Tax Reform. In the context of that proposal, the VAT was advanced as a possible new tax, if taken together with income tax reforms (rates and threshold) and a re-visit of the then existing system of "tax-holidays", granted in the main, but not exclusively, to foreign firms. VAT cannot be treated as a stand alone proposition. To succeed, it must be a part of a more holistic reform of the financing of state activities.
The National Commission on Tax Reform proposed by the WPA is envisaged as a means to achieve several objectives at the same time. First, it would be part of a process, not a single episode event. It would involve all stakeholders - taxpayers, government, business groups, unions, farmers organisations, professional bodies and Parliament. Second, it would serve to reduce conflict and seek out national consensus building. Third, it would take place in a comprehensive and systematic way treating the tax environment as a whole and not in piece-meal fashion as it now happens. Fourth, this would legitimise the subsequent zero tolerance approach to tax violators, as all stakeholders would have shared in the design and implementation of the process. Finally, it aids democratic-decision-making, accountability and transparency in the broader society.
It would not be appropriate to end without stating that the major concern of all the organizations mentioned above that despite all claims of intended budget neutrality by the government is the unprecedented regressive nature of the VAT tax with its deleterious effect on poverty alleviation efforts and on the standard of living of fixed income earners and those least able to adjust. Given the unexpected revenue bonanza from the VAT, what is needed is a reduction in the over all rate and an extension of the exemption list of basic goods and services (particularly public utility services) and specifically imposing an even lower VAT rate on same
Respectfully,
Desmond
Trotman
Centre Manager
Rodney House